Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Gaio vs Simone Agostini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Agostini analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Simone Agostini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaio 1 - 0 Agostini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 47.39% of points on their second serve, while Agostini has won 50.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 49.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Agostini has won 52.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.44% and 37.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 56.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Agostini has saved 58.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 38.64% of matches played (W/L 17/ 27), with Agostini winning 56.45% (W/L 35/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 327/ 253), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Agostini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 63/ 57), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 19), where as Agostini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.38% of matches (W/L 35/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gaio winning 1 times and Agostini being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gaio winning 2 and Agostini winning 0. The last match between Gaio and Agostini was at the M25 Grasse, 05-06-2024, Second, Clay with Federico Gaio getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Agostini have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gaio winning 0 times and Agostini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Agostini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 302.75 while Agostini has played against players with an average rank of 61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Agostini has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 35.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Agostini has converted 45.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
387
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
54% (519-436)
Career Total W/L
52% (65-60)
33% (7-14)
YTD W/L
56% (20-16)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Federico Gaio vs Simone Agostini For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gaio VS Agostini
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Federico Gaio | Simone Agostini |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (42/60) | 65% (43/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (28/42) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (12/18) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (32/66) | 33% (20/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Simone Agostini
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Gaio | Simone Agostini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (7/14) | 56% (20/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (17/33) | 58% (45/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (208/258) | 56% (379/302) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 56% (20/16) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:33 | 1:15:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 268.33 | 64.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (875/1506) | 65% (922/1422) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (577/875) | 59% (541/922) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (299/631) | 50% (251/500) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (48/136) | 45% (70/154) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (559/1522) | 43% (588/1372) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 18% (2/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 56% (20/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 30% (6/20) | 56% (20/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 7% (15/1) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Federico Gaio
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Federico Gaio
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Andrea Picchione
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Simone Agostini
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Federico Gaio
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Simone Agostini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Simone Agostini
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simone Agostini
Player
Raffael Schaer
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simone Agostini
Player
Paul-Antoine Brazet
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Simone Agostini
Player
Danylo Pustovoitenko
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Simone Agostini
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Niccolo Ciavarella
Player
Simone Agostini
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simone Agostini
Player
Pietro Pampanin
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Simone Agostini
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaio Vs Agostini Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gaio are available here and Agostini photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
